At a deposition, what statement about the marking of an exhibit is true?

Prepare for the Certified Shorthand Reporter (CSR) Test with engaging questions, detailed explanations, and helpful tips. Master the skills needed to excel as a shorthand reporter!

An exhibit may be marked for identification only is true because during a deposition, it is common practice to label documents as exhibits that are to be used for identification purposes, rather than admitting them into evidence at that moment. This allows the examining party to ask questions about the document without it being formally introduced as part of the trial record. The process of marking for identification helps maintain clarity during the deposition, ensuring that both parties understand which documents are being discussed without necessarily implying that they will be admitted as evidence later on.

The other options suggest procedures that either do not align with the common practice of depositions or imply restrictions that are not typically enforced in a deposition setting. For example, it is not required that all exhibits submitted must be admitted into evidence at a deposition, as certain documents may simply be used for reference or clarification. Also, exhibits can indeed be marked during depositions, contrary to the statement suggesting they are never marked during this phase. Lastly, exhibits can be marked at any point prior to or during a deposition, not solely after it concludes.